Administering the agreement after signature β where the choice of contract type decides who carries which risk.
π Where this lives: FIDIC's colour-coded contract books are the closest thing engineering has to a universal legal language. The Red Book (works designed by the employer), Yellow Book (designed by the contractor) and Silver Book (turnkey, EPC) are used on projects financed by the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank worldwide, including throughout Nepal β so an engineer in Kathmandu and one in Nairobi administering the same clause number are administering the same obligation. Search "FIDIC Red Yellow Silver Book conditions of contract".
Contract types and the allocation of risk
A CONTRACT IS A LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT. Its essential
elements: OFFER, ACCEPTANCE, CONSIDERATION, CAPACITY, FREE
CONSENT, and a LAWFUL OBJECT. In Nepal, contracts are governed by
the CONTRACT ACT 2056 (2000) and, for public works, the Public
Procurement Act.
THE ORGANISING IDEA OF THE WHOLE TOPIC:
A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ALLOCATING
RISK. THE PRICING MECHANISM DETERMINES WHO BEARS THE
CONSEQUENCE IF COSTS OR QUANTITIES TURN OUT DIFFERENTLY
FROM EXPECTED.
ββ THE MAIN TYPES ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
1. LUMP SUM (FIXED PRICE)
One price for the whole defined scope.
RISK: THE CONTRACTOR carries almost all cost risk.
REQUIRES: a complete, unambiguous design before tender.
ADVANTAGES: the client knows the price; minimal
measurement administration; strong incentive for
efficiency.
DISADVANTAGES: the contractor prices a RISK PREMIUM into
the bid; changes are expensive because there is no
competitive pressure on a variation; and A CONTRACTOR
SQUEEZED ON A FIXED PRICE WILL PURSUE CLAIMS
AGGRESSIVELY. The client pays for certainty either way.
2. UNIT PRICE / ITEM RATE (MEASURE AND VALUE)
The bidder rates each item in the BILL OF QUANTITIES;
payment follows the QUANTITY ACTUALLY MEASURED.
RISK: THE CLIENT carries the QUANTITY risk; THE CONTRACTOR
carries the RATE risk.
THE COMMONEST FORM FOR CIVIL WORKS, precisely because
earthworks and foundations cannot be quantified exactly
in advance.
ADVANTAGES: work can start before quantities are final;
changes are priced at pre-agreed rates.
DISADVANTAGES: the final cost is not known at award;
measurement is administratively heavy; and it is
vulnerable to FRONT LOADING and to UNBALANCED BIDDING,
where a contractor rates items highly whose quantities
they expect to increase.
3. COST PLUS
The contractor is reimbursed actual cost plus a fee:
COST PLUS PERCENTAGE β the fee is a percentage of cost.
NOTE THE PERVERSE INCENTIVE: THE HIGHER THE COST, THE
HIGHER THE FEE. This form is rightly rare and is
prohibited in many public systems.
COST PLUS FIXED FEE β the fee does not rise with cost, so
the perverse incentive is removed but no efficiency
incentive replaces it.
COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE β the fee varies with performance
against a target cost, sharing savings and overruns.
THE BEST-ALIGNED OF THE THREE.
RISK: THE CLIENT carries nearly all of it.
USED WHEN THE SCOPE GENUINELY CANNOT BE DEFINED β
emergency works, unpredictable repair, early-stage R&D.
4. TARGET COST β a target is agreed, and savings or overruns
against it are SHARED in an agreed ratio (a "pain/gain"
mechanism). A deliberate middle position.
5. TURNKEY / EPC β design and construction for one price, with
the contractor carrying design risk as well.
THE SPECTRUM, which is the diagram worth drawing:
CONTRACTOR RISK ββββββββββββββββββββββββΆ CLIENT RISK
LUMP SUM TARGET COST UNIT PRICE COST PLUS
AND THE PRINCIPLE THAT SHOULD GOVERN THE CHOICE:
RISK SHOULD BE ALLOCATED TO THE PARTY BEST ABLE TO CONTROL
IT.
Allocating a risk to a party who cannot control it does not
remove the risk; it simply means they price it, or fail to
price it and later claim. Transferring ground conditions risk
to a contractor who was given no time to investigate the
ground is a transfer in words only, and it produces disputes
rather than protection.
Administration, claims and disputes
ββ THE PARTIES βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
EMPLOYER (client) β commissions and pays
CONTRACTOR β executes
THE ENGINEER (or Project Manager) β administers the contract:
supervises, certifies payment, issues instructions and
variations, and DETERMINES CLAIMS IN THE FIRST INSTANCE.
THE ENGINEER'S DUAL ROLE IS THE STRUCTURAL TENSION OF
TRADITIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: engaged and paid by the
employer, yet required to act IMPARTIALLY when deciding
between employer and contractor. Modern forms respond by
moving disputes to an independent board, but the tension is
inherent and worth stating in an exam answer.
SUBCONTRACTORS β contracted to the contractor, with NO
contractual relationship with the employer (no "privity of
contract"), which is why a subcontractor cannot generally
sue the employer directly.
ββ THE KEY CONTRACTUAL MECHANISMS ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
SECURITIES AND GUARANTEES
Β· PERFORMANCE SECURITY β commonly 5% of the contract price,
called if the contractor defaults
Β· ADVANCE PAYMENT GUARANTEE β secures mobilisation money
Β· RETENTION β typically 5β10% deducted from each payment,
HALF released at completion and half after the DEFECTS
LIABILITY PERIOD. Its purpose is to leave the contractor
with money at stake until the defects period expires.
TIME
Β· COMMENCEMENT DATE and TIME FOR COMPLETION
Β· EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT) β granted for delays that are the
employer's responsibility or are neutral events, which
RELIEVES THE CONTRACTOR OF DAMAGES BUT DOES NOT
AUTOMATICALLY ENTITLE THEM TO MONEY. Time and money are
separate claims, and conflating them is a classic error.
Β· LIQUIDATED DAMAGES β a pre-agreed sum per day of
culpable delay. IT MUST BE A GENUINE PRE-ESTIMATE OF THE
EMPLOYER'S LOSS; if it is set as a deterrent it may be
struck down as a PENALTY and become unenforceable, leaving
the employer to prove actual loss.
PAYMENT
Β· INTERIM PAYMENT CERTIFICATES against measured work, less
retention and advance recovery
Β· PRICE ADJUSTMENT (escalation) formulae for material and
labour cost movements on long contracts
Β· FINAL ACCOUNT and the FINAL PAYMENT CERTIFICATE
CHANGE
Β· VARIATION ORDERS β the employer's right to alter the
works, valued at BOQ rates where applicable, at pro-rata
rates for similar work, or at fair rates for genuinely
new work.
Β· THE POWER TO VARY IS ESSENTIAL β without it any change
would require a fresh contract β but it is also the main
channel through which the final cost departs from the
tender sum.
DEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD β typically 12 months after
completion, during which the contractor must remedy defects
appearing in the works.
FORCE MAJEURE β exceptional events beyond either party's
control (earthquake, war, epidemic) which suspend
obligations without fault. HIGHLY RELEVANT IN NEPAL, and
contracts should define it explicitly rather than rely on
general law.
ββ CLAIMS ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
A CLAIM is an assertion of entitlement to additional time or
money. THE PROCEDURE MATTERS AS MUCH AS THE MERITS:
1. NOTICE within the period stated in the contract β often
28 days from the event.
MANY CONTRACTS MAKE TIMELY NOTICE A CONDITION PRECEDENT,
WHICH MEANS A LATE NOTICE EXTINGUISHES AN OTHERWISE VALID
CLAIM ENTIRELY. This is the single most practically
important sentence in the topic.
2. CONTEMPORARY RECORDS kept from the moment of the event.
CLAIMS ARE WON AND LOST ON RECORDS β site diaries,
instructions, correspondence, photographs, delay
analyses. A claim asserted months later from memory
fails whatever its merits.
3. DETAILED SUBMISSION: the contractual basis, the cause,
the effect, and the quantification.
4. The Engineer's determination.
5. Dispute resolution if rejected.
COMMON GROUNDS: variations; late issue of drawings or
instructions; delayed possession of the site; UNFORESEEN
GROUND CONDITIONS; employer-caused disruption; suspension;
changes in law.
ββ DISPUTE RESOLUTION, in escalating order βββββββββββββββββ
1. NEGOTIATION β cheapest, fastest, preserves the working
relationship
2. MEDIATION / CONCILIATION β a neutral third party assists,
without a binding decision
3. DISPUTE ADJUDICATION BOARD (DAB/DRB) β a standing panel
giving a decision that BINDS UNLESS AND UNTIL OVERTURNED
BY ARBITRATION. Its value is that WORK CONTINUES while
the dispute proceeds, which is exactly what litigation
fails to achieve.
4. ARBITRATION β a private tribunal, binding and
enforceable. In Nepal under the Arbitration Act 2055.
Faster and more confidential than court, and the arbitrator
can be a person who understands construction.
5. LITIGATION β the courts. Slow, public, and generally the
last resort.
THE PRACTICAL PRINCIPLE: DISPUTES ARE CHEAPEST TO RESOLVE
EARLY AND CLOSE TO THE FACTS. A disagreement settled on site
in a week costs a meeting; the same disagreement in
arbitration three years later costs both parties more than
the sum in issue. THE ESCALATION LADDER EXISTS TO KEEP
DISPUTES AT THE LOWEST RUNG THAT CAN RESOLVE THEM.
ββ CONTRACT CLOSURE ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
substantial completion certificate β defects liability
period β final inspection β performance certificate β
final account agreed β retention released β securities
returned β contract discharged.
AND, AS IN THE LIFE CYCLE TOPIC: THE LESSONS RECORDED, or
the same disputes recur on the next contract.
The principle that should govern every contract choice: allocate each risk to the party best able to control it. Transferring ground conditions risk to a contractor who was never given time to investigate the ground is a transfer in words only β it produces claims and disputes rather than protection, because a risk nobody can control does not disappear by being written into a clause.
π Go further: Notice provisions are where technically valid claims die. Most modern forms require notice of a claim within a stated period β often 28 days β and many make that notice a condition precedent, meaning the entitlement is lost entirely if the deadline is missed, no matter how strong the underlying case. Courts have upheld this repeatedly, on the reasoning that the employer is entitled to know about a claim while it can still investigate and mitigate. The practical consequence for a site engineer is unglamorous and important: notify early, notify in writing, and keep contemporaneous records, because the strength of a claim is decided by paperwork created at the time rather than by argument afterwards. Search "condition precedent notice clause construction claims time bar".
π‘ Exam angle: the comparison of contract types is the near-certain question β set out lump sum, unit price/BOQ, cost plus (with its variants) and target cost, stating for each who bears which risk, when it is appropriate, and its advantages and disadvantages. Draw the risk spectrum and give the allocation principle. Know the key mechanisms: performance security, retention, liquidated damages (genuine pre-estimate, not a penalty), extension of time (time β money), variations and the defects liability period. For claims, stress notice as a condition precedent and contemporary records. List the dispute resolution ladder, explaining the DAB's advantage that work continues.
Syllabus points
Types of contracts; contract administration
Create a free account to tick topics off, take notes as you read, watch the video lessons and get a day-by-day study plan built around your exam date.